Feedback open on proposed changes to AUP for new housing rules

Feedback open on proposed changes to AUP for new housing rules
Wednesday 4 May, 2022
On 19 April 2022 Auckland Council opened public feedback on its preliminary response to implementing central government’s latest housing density policy and legislative changes.
The link to the feedback page is here.
The two instruments prompting these changes are the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (the Policy Statement) and the Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2021 (the Amendment Act). Both require Auckland Council to make changes to the Auckland Unitary Plan to enable greater intensification of residential development. These changes must include new medium density standards across most residential zoned properties, and high density standards around city, town, and local centres, and near rapid transit stops.
This request for feedback is not at the mandatory public notification and consultation stage yet, but you should nonetheless consider submitting your feedback on what is proposed now to ensure that your views are considered by Council as it begins work on preparing the details of its plan change. You only have until 9 May 2022 to submit your views on the preliminary response, otherwise you will need to wait to submit on the notified plan change in late August this year.
What are the proposed changes?
Some of the changes are mandatory under the Amendment Act, while others reflect Auckland Council’s preliminary views on matters that are unique to Auckland and require bespoke responses.
In response to the mandatory matters in the Amendment Act, Auckland Council is proposing to modify the existing Residential – Mixed Housing Urban Zone standards to bring these into line with the medium density requirements in the Amendment Act. These would then apply in most residential zones and allow new houses up to three storeys high to be built without resource consent. Any subdivision would be controlled by a resource consent. These standards will not apply in Residential – Large Lot Zone, small settlements in rural and coastal locations, and islands like Waiheke and Aotea Great Barrier. Two storey development will instead be provided for in these areas.
Auckland Council suggests modifying the existing Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone in areas that are within a proposed walkable catchment of qualifying centres. The changes would mean that land that is in that zone and within the walkable catchment could go to six storeys as a permitted activity, rather than the status quo of five. Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zoned land outside a walkable catchment will retain the current at five storeys permitted currently.
These new standards will also not apply to any property which is subject to a qualifying matter set out in the Amendment Act. These matters include cultural or heritage characteristics, or susceptibility to natural hazards.
Auckland Council is considering adding bespoke qualifying matters to address issues that are unique to Auckland. These include retention of some special character areas currently subject to the special character overlay of the Unitary Plan. There is also a proposed infrastructure constraints qualifying matter which would reduce intensification in areas with significant long term infrastructure restrictions that prevent Council servicing the level of growth envisioned in the Amendment Act.
Auckland Council is also proposing qualifying matters to continue protecting several identified viewshafts, and development controls within the CBD.
What can I provide feedback on?
Auckland Council cannot, by law, decline to implement the “three-across, three-up” changes required by the Amendment Act, nor the imposition of six storeys in walkable catchments. This initial feedback is limited to matters Auckland Council is considering including in the Plan Change, including:
- the appropriate size of “walkable catchment”;
- the size of suburban, town, and local centres where 6 stories are allowed;
- the other qualifying matters specific to Auckland.
Despite this being a preliminary response or feedback session, you may wish to take the opportunity to submit your views by 9 May 2022 here.
If you would like to discuss what the Policy Statement, Amendment Act, and Preliminary Response may mean for you, your property, and your neighbourhood, please reach out to our Environment and Resources Management Team.
Talk to one of our experts
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022

Operative plans and proposed plans: what to do when there is a significant policy shift?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Avoidance policies reign in the wake of King Salmon, but what do they require?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Will new housing density rules increase contributions for developers?
Thursday 28 October, 2021

Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Randerson Report released: New Direction for Resource Management
Wednesday 5 August, 2020

Could companies be liable to the public for the harm caused by their emissions?
Tuesday 10 March, 2020

Avoiding double penalties when sentencing a company and director
Thursday 23 April, 2020

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2019 for consultation
Thursday 3 October, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018

High Court finds Council liable in negligence for damage from fallen tree
Thursday 27 September, 2018

Court upholds sensible approach to local authority works on private property
Tuesday 24 July, 2018

Must Councils accept an assertion that a person is ‘suitably qualified'?
Friday 9 March, 2018
