RMA Reform: Proposed changes to the resource management system

RMA Reform: Proposed changes to the resource management system
Monday 7 December, 2020
A major review of the resource management system and the Resource Management Act (RMA) was undertaken by a Panel appointed by the Minister for the Environment. The Panel’s scope of review included the relationship of the RMA with other key public administration and infrastructure legislation, but did not extend to examining local government reform. This article provides a summary of the overall review and proposed reform.
The Panel released its Report in July 2020, which set out the overall issues found with the current resource management system, including:
- A lack of integrated planning and an inefficient and ineffective system;
- Insufficient provision for urban growth;
- An absence of national direction;
- Poor recognition of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and te ao Māori; and
- An unbalanced focus on adverse effects.
The Panel proposes to repeal the RMA to overcome these issues and replace it with two new acts called:
- The Natural and Built Environment Act (NBEA); and
- The Strategic Planning Act (SPA).
Despite the proposed repeal, the Panel recommends retaining the core principles established in the RMA, being sustainability and ensuring the needs of future generations are met. Avoiding, remedying, or mitigating the adverse effects of activities are also intended to be retained in new legislation. In addition to those principles, other new concepts proposed in NBEA are:
- Recognition of the concept of Te Mana o te Taiao (maintaining the health of air, water, soil and ecosystems and their capacity to sustain life);
- Extending the definition of the environment to both natural and built environments;
- An outcomes-focused direction which promotes positive outcomes;
- Mandatory environmental limits set by the Minister for certain biophysical aspects (freshwater, coastal water, air, soil, and habitats for indigenous species);
- Environmental targets, set by ministers and local authorities for continual progress towards achieving the outcomes in NBEA; and
- Combined Plans, which will be created by territorial and regional authorities for each region and must be consistent with their applicable regional spatial plan under SPA.
The Panel also proposes SPA, which requires mandatory regional spatial planning for both land and the coastal marine area. Regional spatial strategies will also:
- Set the long-term objectives for urban growth and land use change;
- Be consistent with mandatory national direction under NBEA;
- Respond to climate change;
- Identify areas inappropriate for development;
- Be created by a joint committee of representatives from their constituent territorial and regional authorities and Mana Whenua, as well as central government;
- Set a 30-year strategic direction; and
- Be reviewed every nine years.
The Panel recommends NBEA and SPA will be in force within a few years and that the roll-out of the regional spatial strategies and combined plans will follow a sequencing order, to act as a model for the succeeding regions to follow. Mandatory national direction should also be completed within three years of NBEA’s enactment.
If you have any questions relating to this article, please contact one of our experts listed below.
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Operative plans and proposed plans: what to do when there is a significant policy shift?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Avoidance policies reign in the wake of King Salmon, but what do they require?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Will new housing density rules increase contributions for developers?
Thursday 28 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Randerson Report released: New Direction for Resource Management
Wednesday 5 August, 2020

Could companies be liable to the public for the harm caused by their emissions?
Tuesday 10 March, 2020

Avoiding double penalties when sentencing a company and director
Thursday 23 April, 2020

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2019 for consultation
Thursday 3 October, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018

Must Councils accept an assertion that a person is ‘suitably qualified'?
Friday 9 March, 2018
