The Ombudsman's new approach to 'delay' complaints
The Ombudsman's new approach to 'delay' complaints
Thursday 13 July, 2017
The Office of the Ombudsman has just announced that, from 1 July 2017, it will be taking a new approach to how it responds to complaints about delays in making and communicating decisions on requests for official information within the maximum statutory timeframe (i.e. 20 working days).
Previously, the Ombudsman dealt with delay complaints in the same way as other complaints – by way of formal investigation. The new approach has been developed following an increase in the number of ‘delay’ complaints. The Ombudsman’s aim is to incentivise agencies to achieve the statutory timeframes imposed by the Local Government and Official Information Act 1987 (‘LGOIMA’) and the Official Information Act 1982.
The new approach will see the Ombudsman reacting to and seeking to resolve delay complaints much more quickly.
Key features of the new approach
- The Ombudsman’s first step on receiving a delay complaint will be to contact the council involved, to establish whether there has, in fact, been a delay.
- Council has five working days to respond to the Ombudsman.
- If a council communicates a decision to the requester before the five days are up, the Ombudsman’s complaint process ceases. Councils will need to copy the Ombudsman in to their correspondence with the requester.
- If a decision on the request has not been made by the council within the five days, the Ombudsman will begin an investigation and form a provisional opinion, which will be provided to the council.
- The council will then have two weeks to comment on the provisional opinion.
- The Ombudsman will discontinue the investigation if, before the two weeks expires, the delay is acknowledged by the council and a decision is communicated to the requester.
- The Ombudsman will form a final opinion and consider making recommendations if, within the two weeks, a decision on the request is not made or communicated to the requester.
What the changes mean for councils
- The time and energy spent in dealing with ‘delay’ complaints will be reduced but Councils’ obligations under the LGOIMA remain the same.
- Councils should ensure that they have a process in place for recording requests and tracking response timeframes (including maximum timeframes for transferring requests, deciding and communicating decisions, and seeking an extension of statutory time limits).
A LGOIMA response calculator, which councils may find useful, has been developed by the Ombudsman - http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
Our thanks to Anna Rowlands for contributing to this article.
Related Articles
Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023
When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022
Operative plans and proposed plans: what to do when there is a significant policy shift?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Avoidance policies reign in the wake of King Salmon, but what do they require?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021
Will new housing density rules increase contributions for developers?
Thursday 28 October, 2021
Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021
Randerson Report released: New Direction for Resource Management
Wednesday 5 August, 2020
Could companies be liable to the public for the harm caused by their emissions?
Tuesday 10 March, 2020
Avoiding double penalties when sentencing a company and director
Thursday 23 April, 2020
Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019
Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2019 for consultation
Thursday 3 October, 2019
Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019
Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019
Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
Must Councils accept an assertion that a person is ‘suitably qualified'?
Friday 9 March, 2018
