New Statutory requirements for consent conditions

New Statutory requirements for consent conditions
Thursday 23 November, 2017
Section 108AA of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the RMA”) was inserted as part of the recent resource legislation amendments and came into effect on 18 October 2017. The new section introduces restrictions which limit the scope of conditions that may be imposed on a resource consent, in addition to the requirements of sections 108 and 220.
Previously, consent authorities had wide discretion to implement conditions they considered appropriate under section 108 of the RMA. In the absence of a statutory limit on the nature of conditions that could be imposed, it was left to the Courts to define parameters. The Newbury test requires that to be valid, a condition must:
- Be for a resource management purpose, not for an ulterior one;
- Fairly and reasonably relate to the development authorised by the consent to which the condition is attached;
- Not be so unreasonable that a reasonable planning authority, duly appreciating its statutory duties, could not have approved it; and
- Not involve an unlawful delegation of the consent authority’s duties.
The Supreme Court provided further guidance with regard to the second limb of the test in Waitakere City Council v Estate Homes Limited [2006] NZSC 112 holding that a condition need not be essential for the development’s purpose. Rather, there must be a ‘logical connection’ between the proposed development and a condition of consent. Further, this connection does not have to relate to the effects of the proposed development.
Under the new provision, a consent authority can only include a condition on a resource consent if:
- The applicant agrees; or
- The condition is directly connected to an adverse effect of the activity on the environment and/or an applicable district or regional rule or environmental standard; or
- The condition relates to administrative matters that are essential for the efficient implementation of the relevant resource consent.
Section 108AA provides greater certainty with the introduction of statutory limits on the nature of conditions that can be imposed and may be characterised as a refinement to the approach under Newbury. The specific requirement that the condition be directly connected to an adverse effect of the activity on the environment is a change to the approach in Waitakere but nevertheless provides greater certainty for applicants and consent authorities alike as to the scope of conditions which may be imposed. The inclusion of s108AA(a) essentially codifies the well-known Augiers principle whereby an applicant can offer up a conditions which may otherwise be considered “unreasonable” (or unlawful). We will watch with interest for the issue of any caselaw on section 108AA and provide a report in subsequent issues of this brief.
Please contact Bridget Parham if you want to learn more about the issues discussed in this article.
Author
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Operative plans and proposed plans: what to do when there is a significant policy shift?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Avoidance policies reign in the wake of King Salmon, but what do they require?
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Will new housing density rules increase contributions for developers?
Thursday 28 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Randerson Report released: New Direction for Resource Management
Wednesday 5 August, 2020

Could companies be liable to the public for the harm caused by their emissions?
Tuesday 10 March, 2020

Avoiding double penalties when sentencing a company and director
Thursday 23 April, 2020

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2019 for consultation
Thursday 3 October, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018

Must Councils accept an assertion that a person is ‘suitably qualified'?
Friday 9 March, 2018
