The role of Councils in the 'foreign buyer ban'

The role of Councils in the 'foreign buyer ban'
Thursday 27 September, 2018
Councils should ensure that a property’s “property category” is included in the searchable property information available on their websites.
The Overseas Investment Amendment Act 2018 (“Amendment Act”) comes into force on 22 October 2018 and implements the much touted “foreign buyer ban” for residential properties in New Zealand. The Amendment Act amends the Overseas Investment Act 2005 (“Act”) and (among other things) makes “residential land” sensitive land under the Act. As from 22 October 2018 overseas persons acquiring interests in residential land will be required to obtain consent and meet certain ‘benefit to New Zealand’ tests.
“Residential land” is defined as land that has a property category of “residential” (R) or “lifestyle” (L) in the district valuation roll, which is required to be kept by local authorities under section 7 of the Rating Valuations Act 1998 and rules made under that Act.
Currently, under rules 2.1 and 2.2 of the Rating Valuations Rules 2008, the district valuation roll is not required to include the property category, but the property category must be kept and maintained by the local authority. We searched a few different Councils’ rating information databases and other public property related information available on those Councils’ websites, and most do not currently include the property category.
Given the changes resulting from the Amendment Act outlined above, the property category will be sought after information by lawyers, real estate agents and vendors and purchasers. To avoid an inundation of enquiries from these parties, we suggest that Council’s update their rating information databases to ensure that the relevant property category is prominently and clearly displayed.
For more information about the Amendment Act and its implications for local authorities, please contact Campbell Stewart.
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Making a counteroffer: what to know before you sign on the dotted line
Thursday 22 April, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
