Productivity Commission Draft Report

Productivity Commission Draft Report
Thursday 3 October, 2019
The Productivity Commission released its draft report on Local Government funding and financing on 4 July. The Commission assessed current and prospective funding tools through the lens of five principles:
- Appropriate for local government use, given the role of local government
- Coherent with national policy objectives and the wider tax system
- Efficient, to avoid harmful incentive effects, and minimise compliance and administration costs
- Equitable and fair, who benefits?
- Sustainable, to provide stable and predictable revenue over time and minimise avoidance
The Commission concludes that the current framework is broadly sound and that some councils could make better use of it. It recommends that all Councils have an assurance committee that is independently chaired, and that performance reporting is fundamentally reviewed to simplify its requirements.
The Commission believes that local government charges should be primarily targeted towards those who benefit from the services, with some consideration of ability to pay. It favours the following new funding tools for growth infrastructure:
- Value capture, volumetric charging for wastewater, and road congestion pricing;
- Special purpose vehicles to assist Councils nearing their debt limits (it’s worth noting that the Commission report indicates that Council gearing ratios are lower than central government’s; it is the peculiarities of the LGFA covenants that makes it seem that Councils are debt constrained);
- Direct payments from central government linked to new building, incentivising Councils to make land available.
Interestingly, consistent with its support for the benefit principle, the Commission recommends removing the ability to set rates differentially, and the removal of uniform annual general charges. This would be a seismic change for most Councils and while this will increase transparency, this is likely to make the rates process subject to more challenge, because rates are essentially a tax and Councils do not have to show direct benefit.
For assistance with questions relating to this article, please contact Mark Renner.
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

Spotlight on how long large businesses take to pay their bills
Wednesday 22 February, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
