Consultation obligations for Outsourcing contracts
Consultation obligations for Outsourcing contracts
Thursday 20 June, 2019
We have been involved in several recent instances in which a local authority planned to outsource its water and/or wastewater operations. Local authorities are prohibited from selling their relevant assets unless it is to another local authority or CCO, so these arrangements typically take the form of long term operations contracts. Provided that the specific provisions in Part 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) are complied with, these arrangements are lawful.
However, extensive outsourcing contracts can easily involve a loss of control of the asset. In that case, section 97 of the LGA may apply. Section 97 prevents a local authority from transferring the ownership or control of a strategic asset unless the decision is explicitly provided for in a local authority’s long term plan.
Accordingly, a decision to enter into an outsourcing arrangement may require a LTP amendment.
For assistance with questions relating to this article, please contact Mark Renner.
Related Articles
Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023
When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022
Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022
Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022
New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022
Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022
Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021
Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021
Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021
Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021
Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021
Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019
Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019
Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019
Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
