An opportunity for metro council local alcohol policies?

An opportunity for metro council local alcohol policies?
Tuesday 19 July, 2022
The Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act came into force almost ten years ago. Local Alcohol Policies (LAPs) were to be a key component of the new ‘harm minimisation’ approach. Communities were to be given a voice on issues like outlet density and proximity to sensitive sites like schools.
But after almost a decade, none of the country’s four biggest cities has a LAP. That’s because of the convoluted and costly appeals process for LAPs. Supermarkets and bottle shops have used the appeals process to their advantage and the community has been shut out. Christchurch, Wellington and Hamilton all pulled the plug on their provisional LAPs at various points during the appeals process. Appeals against Auckland’s provisional LAP are still on-going. This April the supermarket chains were granted leave to appeal Auckland Council’s provisional LAP to the Supreme Court.
The Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Harm Minimisation) Amendment Bill would change this. It would repeal the appeal process entirely. To adopt a LAP, a local authority would simply have to consult its community (which the Act already requires). Supermarkets and bottle shops could still participate in consultation alongside all other members of the community. But they would have no right to appeal against the LAP. Ordinary judicial review rights would continue to apply where there were errors of law or process.
The Bill is a Member’s Bill and was recently pulled from the Parliamentary Biscuit Tin. It was introduced to the House on 30 June 2022. The date of its first reading has not been set.
Before being pulled from the Biscuit Tin, the Bill was endorsed by several local authorities including Hamilton City Council, Waipā District Council, and Auckland Council. It will be interesting to see to what extent the support that the Bill has received at the local authority level translates in Parliament. We will keep a watching brief on the Bill’s progress and provide updates in future editions of Legal Brief.
Megan has advised Hamilton City Council, Waikato District Council and Rotorua Lakes Council on appeals against their provisional LAPs. As noted above, Hamilton City Council ultimately chose not to pursue its provisional LAP. Waikato District Council and Rotorua Lakes Council have LAPs in place.
Talk to one of our experts
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
