Fair Pay Agreements Bill

Fair Pay Agreements Bill
Wednesday 13 July, 2022
The Government has introduced the Fair Pay Agreements Bill (“the FPA Bill"). This will become law only after being granted “Royal Assent” following a parliamentary process.
If the FPA Bill does become law, this has the potential to affect any industry or occupation in New Zealand. Employees and employers alike will be affected by this, including those in the local government sector.
The Government’s stated intention, through the FPA Bill, is to improve labour market outcomes in New Zealand by enabling employers and employees to collectively bargain for industry-wide or occupation-specific minimum employment standards. This is intended to improve jobs with inadequate working conditions, low wages, and low productivity.
If enacted, the FPA Bill will provide a framework that brings together employees, represented by unions, and employers, who can be represented by employer associations, within an industry to bargain for minimum employment terms for all employees in that industry or occupation. Employees and employers can be a part of the bargaining process, whether they have joined one of these unions/associations or not.
The framework that will be provided by the FPA Bill allows for a union to initiate bargaining for a Fair Pay Agreement (“FPA”) by applying to the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment. To do so, the union would need to demonstrate that either:
- 10% of employees, or1,000 employees, in the relevant industry or occupation support the initiation of bargaining; or
- That there is public interest in initiating bargaining due to employees in the relevant industry/occupation having poor conditions of employment, a lack of bargaining power and/or a lack of pay progression.
Once bargaining is initiated, a Fair Pay Agreement may be reached between the participating employees/unions and employers/associations. In some situations where the parties cannot reach an agreement during bargaining, the FPA Bill would allow the Employment Relations Authority to make determinations setting terms and conditions of the Fair Pay Agreement (including mandatory ones). This has been politically contentious, as it would allow the Authority the power to mandate contractual terms of employment, on a large scale.
Whichever way a Fair Pay Agreement is reached, all parties to an employment relationship, in an industry or occupation that is subject to the Fair Pay Agreement, will be legally required to comply with that Fair Pay Agreement. This will include all employees and all employers in that industry/occupation, regardless of whether they were involved in the bargaining process. For unwitting employers or employees, this may mean that unknown unions and associations will negotiate significant agreements that bind those employers/employees.
The FPA Bill is politically contentious and has been hotly debated. There remains a possibility of late changes to the FPA Bill, as concerns are voiced around how the FPA Bill, in its current form, would operate in practice and whether unintended harm would result.
Business NZ, which was previously expected to bargain for Fair Pay Agreements as an employer association, has claimed that the FPA Bill is unlawful and in breach of international obligations. This allegation has reportedly been escalated with the International Labour Organisation.
The system presented by the FPA Bill could be considered the most fundamentally significant change to employment relations in New Zealand since 2000. Having been introduced to Parliament on 29 March 2022, the FPA Bill unsuccessfully passed its first reading on 5 April 2022 and is currently with the Select Committee.
Before obtaining “Royal Assent” and becoming law, the FPA Bill must yet progress through two further readings. Whether and when this happens is yet to be seen but is anticipated to occur at the end of 2022. The FPA Bill’s journey towards becoming law is unfolding, and its fate may impact on us whether we like it or not.
For any questions relating to this article, please get in touch with one of our experts listed below.
Author
Talk to one of our experts
Related Articles

Councils challenge to transfer of water services rejected in High Court
Thursday 30 March, 2023

Fair Pay Agreements: How employers can prepare for the process
Thursday 1 December, 2022

When the rubber hits the road - All aboard Aotearoa's challenge
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Declarations that an Enactment Inconsistent with Bill of Rights
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

“I’ve changed my mind” – The Implications of a Buoyant Labour Market
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

Proposed mandatory consideration of specific Māori representation
Tuesday 11 October, 2022

New Regime for Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower legislation)
Wednesday 29 June, 2022

Notices of requirement are relevant for resource consent applications
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Court gives guidance on consultation and decision-making process
Wednesday 30 March, 2022

Game, set and vax: Does no jab mean no match for unvaccinated athletes?
Wednesday 2 February, 2022

Restraint of trade agreements: what are they and are they enforceable?
Friday 21 January, 2022

Employers concerned about Covid sick leave, infection risks and random testing
Friday 14 January, 2022

Cultural evidence and the continued draw of the overall judgment
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

Fluoridation debate lifted from shoulders of local government
Tuesday 21 December, 2021

New COVID legislation makes it easier for employers to impose vaccinate mandates
Friday 3 December, 2021

Can employers require employees to be vaccinated for commercial reasons?
Monday 29 November, 2021

Judicial review of Hamilton City Council's development contributions policy
Tuesday 5 October, 2021

Lease of Wanaka Airport set aside due to insufficient consultation
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

What if an abatement notice requires you to breach the Resource Management Act?
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

“No ‘wine-ing’ covenants” declined for a subdivision consent in Gibbston Valley
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

From car parking fine to judicial review of a council’s code of conduct
Tuesday 15 June, 2021

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the RMA
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
